- Seminars 2018-2019
- Seminars 2017-2018
- Seminars 2016-2017
- Seminars 2015-2016
- Seminars 2014-2015
- Seminars 2013-2014
- Seminars 2012-2013
- Seminars 2011-2012
- Hierarchical organization and self-organization
- McLuhan, Media, Emergence and Complexity Theory
- An approach for actor-based transdisciplinary innovation of socio-economic value-chains
- The Future Internet as a Global Brain: an update of the theory
- Languaging as a second order of joint control process
- Workshop: Worldviews and religiosity
- The origins of the origin: points and cycles as cognitive attractors for ultimate explanations
- The Complexity of Architecture
- Transformation of uncertainty in the therapeutic process
- What is an action?
- The Global Brain Facilitates Human Biological Immortality
- Evaluation of a self-organizing ambient intelligence based traffic system
- Synthetron wisdom of crowds via evolutionary (propagated) consensus in online discussions: experiences and challenges
- A walk in graph databases
- An introduction to Living Labs
- How speech-acts are conquering the world
- 'The Interrelatedness of Many Things': Toward a McLuhanist Philosophy of Technology
- The social dynamics of ontological commitment
- Who needs a worldview ?
- Organizations and Conceptual Paradoxes, Defined by Action Ontology
- Chemical Organizations: Theory and Applications
- Seminars 2010-2011
- Seminars 2009-2010
- Seminars 2008-2009
- Seminars 2007-2008
- Seminars 2006-2007
- Seminars 2004-2005
- Seminars 2005-2006
The origins of the origin: points and cycles as cognitive attractors for ultimate explanations
Submitted by Weaver Silken on Sat, 12/03/2011 - 18:23
The origins of the origin:
points and cycles as cognitive attractors for ultimate explanations
Clement Vidal (ECCO, VUB)
Abstract:
All civilizations have developed myths explaining the origin of the world. They provide answers the fundamental worldview question: “where does it all come from?”. This childish question holds in fact four puzzling challenges, whose nature are epistemological, metaphysical, thermodynamical and causal. They can be summarized with the following questions: what are the epistemological characteristics of an ultimate theory? why not nothing? where does the energy of the universe comes from? what was the causal origin of the universe?
Our approach to these questions is cognitive and philosophical. What is a cognitively satisfying answer to the origin of the universe? What do we cognitively expect to be a satisfying answer to the ultimate origin? What are the limitations and biases of those explanations? We first outline four major challenges that an ultimate explanation must face. We then show that there are two cognitive attractors on which ultimate explanations tend to fall, the point and the cycle. They are similar to the fixed point and the limit-cycle in dynamical system theory. We analyze both the standard Big Bang model and the creation by a God as point attractors. We raise objections against cyclical cosmological models, such as the logical viciousness of cycles, or the idea of an infinite eternal return. We propose replies and remedies to these issues, and conclude that cycle-like explanations are more promising than point-like explanations.
»
- Printer-friendly version
- Login to post comments