- Seminars 2016-2017
- Exponential Self-Organization: Measures and Mechanisms
- When Slower is Faster
- Organized Complexity: is big history a big computation?
- Information: Ultimate Notion Common to Computer Science, Biology, and Human Cognition
- What are the mechanisms of power, and how can we organize ourselves against it?
- The Buffering-Challenging Strategy for Health, Fitness and Life-extension
- Digital Literacy for Humanity in the State of Flux: An Urban Narrative
- Patterns that Connect: Exploring the Concept of Pattern in the Face of Growing Complexity
- Demarcating mathematical understanding and the understanding subject
- Adaptation by Product Hacking
- A Mimetic View on the Firm
- Consequences of the Symbolic-Imaginary for Big History
- THE MACHINE (pt. 1)
- Deploying CAS within the Urban Fabric: Conceptualizing how partitioning, stigmergic signaling, and mutability support emergent unfolding
- Dancing Observer: An Introduction to Acceptance and Commitment Therapy
- United Humanity Ledger as a bedrock for the fair, sustainable, and creative future: A case for an existential opportunity exploration
- Seminars 2015-2016
- Seminars 2014-2015
- Seminars 2013-2014
- Seminars 2012-2013
- Seminars 2011-2012
- Hierarchical organization and self-organization
- McLuhan, Media, Emergence and Complexity Theory
- An approach for actor-based transdisciplinary innovation of socio-economic value-chains
- The Future Internet as a Global Brain: an update of the theory
- Languaging as a second order of joint control process
- Workshop: Worldviews and religiosity
- The origins of the origin: points and cycles as cognitive attractors for ultimate explanations
- The Complexity of Architecture
- Transformation of uncertainty in the therapeutic process
- What is an action?
- The Global Brain Facilitates Human Biological Immortality
- Evaluation of a self-organizing ambient intelligence based traffic system
- Synthetron wisdom of crowds via evolutionary (propagated) consensus in online discussions: experiences and challenges
- A walk in graph databases
- An introduction to Living Labs
- How speech-acts are conquering the world
- 'The Interrelatedness of Many Things': Toward a McLuhanist Philosophy of Technology
- The social dynamics of ontological commitment
- Who needs a worldview ?
- Organizations and Conceptual Paradoxes, Defined by Action Ontology
- Chemical Organizations: Theory and Applications
- Seminars 2010-2011
- Seminars 2009-2010
- Seminars 2008-2009
- Seminars 2007-2008
- Seminars 2006-2007
- Seminars 2004-2005
- Seminars 2005-2006
How speech-acts are conquering the world
Submitted by Weaver Silken on Thu, 05/10/2012 - 23:41
How speech-acts are conquering the world
Luk van Langenhove (CRIS, United Nations University)
This talk is about the ontology of the social realm. It will be argued that the 'substance' of the social world is made out of speech-acts. They can be regarded as the equivalent of what matter is for the natural world. But where matter can be situated in an Euclidean time-space grid, speech-acts exist in a different grid that is non-Euclidean. As such, speech-acts constantly shape a 'parallel universe' to the natural world: a social world that allows persons and institutions to exist and interact. In that world causality exists next to intentionality.
Furthermore, it will be argued that in the course of the history of mankind, speech-acts have found technological devices to become more independent of people. They can now 'travel' instantly across the planet or stay dormant for many years and come back to live again. Together, the universe of speech acts form a world wide web that envelops all people on Earth.
Finally , the question will be raised if this metaphorical view of the substance of the social realm can be pushed further: are we entering a new era in which speech-acts can interact with other speech-acts without persons as intermediates?
Van Langenhove, L. (2007). Innovating the Social Sciences. Vienna: Passagen.
Van Langenhove, L. (2010). People and Societies. London: Routledge.
Van Langenhove, L. (2012). Make social sciences relevant, Nature, vol 484, p. 442.
Slides of the talk: